The Silence vs The Silence vs A Quiet Place

I recently watched The Silence on Netflix, just trying to clear some shows and movies from my watch list.  I immediately noted some of the similarities between this movie and the movie, A Quiet Place.  Along with these similarities, I also noted various comparisons online implying Netflix had simply copied A Quiet Place with a mockbuster knockoff.

However, I also noted that The Silence opening credits had a reference to a novel, also titled The Silence, written by Tim Lebbon.  I decided to do a little reading, do a little research, and decide for myself which was the original concept.

Movies and books always exist in a weird love-hate relationship.  A movie only has so long to tell the story and must leave out some threads while reducing others to focus on the ones that best help tell the story the director wants to tell. This fact is compounded when a movie is based on a book that tells a specific story that is similar in nature to another movie’s story.

This will bring to mind the inevitable comparisons that took place between the movies Hancock and Ironman 2, despite Hancock coming out first, but Ironman 2 being based on an Ironman comic book storyline that was published in 1979, Demon in a Bottle.  Comparisons between the film Alien and the A.E. Vogt short story “The Black Destroyer” also come to mind.  And similar discussions are already taking place with comparisons of Brigthburn and Superman.  In fact, even as I write these words, the Netflix original movie, I Am Mother, is playing in the background and I’m already noticing similarities between it and Tony DiTerlizzi’s The Search for WondLa.

Before I start any comparisons, let’s start with some important notes:

  • A timeline:
    1. The Silence (novel) written by Tim Lebbon and published April 2015
    2. A Quiet Place (movie) released April 6, 2018
    3. The Silence (movie) released April 10, 2019
  • A quick outline of post-apocalyptic literature:
    1. The Event = how the current world ends
    2. The Journey = leaving home for better survival
    3. Survival in the Wild = survivors vs the aftermath, the elements, the new world
    4. Neo-Social Darwinism = strength, weapons, or numbers equals fittest for survival
    5. The New Normal = survivors reaching the place that promises better survival and surviving beyond the initial survival story
  • A note on spoilers:
    1. There is no way to do a comparison of this sort without including spoilers. There are elements between the two movies that require comparisons that will spoil the movies for some viewers. There are elements of difference between The Silence book and the movie that require comparisons that will spoil both for some readers and viewers.
    2. To avoid Spoilers, please do not read beyond this line.

Spoilers beyond this point. You’ve been warned..

In the case of these two stories, or three, depending on your opinion of movies based on books that modify the book story, there is a certain amount of inevitability of similarities that comes just from the nature of the story genres, post-apocalyptic (PA) literature and movies.

PA stories always begin with The Event that demonstrates how the world ends.  Sometimes, the event is directly revealed at the outset.  Sometimes, the event is part of the tale itself. Other times, the event is something that took place before the story begins.  No matter how it is presented, The Event ends our world while beginning the world of the story.

In the case of The Silence, both book (SIN) and movie (SIM), The Event begins the story.  A group is excavating a cave and breeches an inner wall that separate the Vesps, the bird-sized reptilian monsters, from our world.  Chapter lead-in notes and Ally’s internet reading imply the vesps are a product of a separate evolutionary strain resulting from their underground separation from our world. In the movie, the cave breech is shown as cold open lead-in of the movie.  In the book, the cave breech is seen by two of the main characters the father Huw and the daughter Ally while watching the Discovery channel.

In A Quiet Place (AQP), approximately 89 days prior to the film’s opening scene, the event takes place when a meteor shower brings the never-quite-named extraterrestrial monsters to our world.  When we see them, they are approximately human-sized and are somewhere between humanoid and animal in nature. The creatures causing The Event are definitely significantly different in size, but not capacity for lethality in the three stories.

After The Event, The Journey is the next part of the PA story. This is where the main character(s) of the story flee their location at the beginning of the story for the promise of a better chance for survival elsewhere.

This is probably where the biggest divergence begins between the three stories. In AQP, it’s never clear that “the journey” we see the family on at the beginning of the movie is a true journey or anything more than a scavenging supply run.

The Journey from SIN and SIM is much more in-line with the traditional PA story journey. However, these journeys are still slightly and significantly different. In SIN, the family is fleeing London after determining the vesp speed of infestation will bring them within range of the English Channel in a matter of days. And this is after, a rather dramatic journey by Huw to return home from a project site. The journey in SIN also involves a longer, more prolonged series of journeys before they reach safety of the initial house and then the safety of the north, which SIN never makes clear this secondary journey succeeds.

In SIM, they leave the same night as the broadcast of the cave event; and reach the initial house shortly after the incident with the SUV flip. The secondary journey still takes place, but this is more implied than demonstrated until the final scene of the movie showing Ally and her boyfriend having found each other in the north and hunting vesps in the wild.

Survival in the Wild is the part of a PA story that comes after the initial journey. This is where the survivors of the story must battle whatever exists in the aftermath of The Event, the environmental hazards that already (or new ones that result from The Event) existed, and the discovery that the world they knew truly is gone and a new world exists.

In both SIN and SIM, the stories demonstrate this as early as the beginning of the journey. In both stories, the vesps are their own aftermath. They attack at the slightest sound above a whisper and they reproduce at an incredibly excelled rate. The environmental hazards are the same as before, with the exception of normal sound being a life-threatening hazard. The new normal is whispering, silence, and sign language as the difference between life and death.

AQP‘s aftermath is the extraterrestrial monsters now exist everywhere presumably. Reproduction rates never mentioned or acknowledged. The only thing we know for sure about the monsters is that like SIN and SIM, any noise above a whisper can be deadly and whispering, silence, and sign language are the keys to survival. The environmental hazards remain the same to the best of our knowledge since no mention is made of additional results of the meteor crash.  However, the AQP family lives on a corn farm, which of course, adds its own dimensions of traditional horror story problems. With the AQP timeline and approach to the story, the viewer could almost believe this is the world of SIN and SIM at a later date with the vesps now extinct and the new monsters run amok.

The next part of PA stories, sometimes is part of The Journey, sometimes is part of the Survival in the Wild, and sometimes part of The New Normal. A form of Neo-Social Darwinism always takes place in PA stories as society breaks down and might is right, weapons equal right to survive, and strength in numbers rules the day.

The most significant part of AQP is the almost complete absence of this aspect of the PA story. The closest we get to it is a scene where an old man whose wife has just died screams out to attract the monsters to kill him in front of the father and son.

In SIN and SIM, however, Neo-Social Darwinism is a major subplot of the story.  In both, there is an incident where a man uses a shotgun to attempt to carjack Huw’s vehicle. SIN has the man trying to save his own family after an accident, shooting his own wife, and then fleeing with the family’s minivan, causing Huw and his wife to need a new vehicle. SIM has a different outcome, friend of Huw’s family, Glenn, shoots the would-be carjacker, who is on his own, and the family flees with their own vehicle.

However, there is another example of Neo-Social Darwinism in both stories that is far more significant. Certain religious types have determined the vesp attacks to be God’s Judgment and in the local area of the initial house Huw’s family occupies, they encounter the leader of one of these groups which calls themselves The Hushed. Once the leader of The Hushed sees that Ally knows sign language he tries to persuade Huw to have his family join them. In SIN, they want Ally as a teacher of sign language. In SIM, they want Ally for breeding purposes. In both versions, this involves an encounter on a supply run, a confrontation at the house, an attempted murder of the family by the cultists using cell phones to attract the vesps, the attempted kidnapping of Ally, and the grandmother’s self-sacrifice to save Ally. In SIN, the leader gets away, while in SIM, we see HUW beat the leader to death with the butt of the shotgun.

The New Normal is the aftermath of the successful PA story journey. The characters reach the promised place of refuge and survival and begin to live their lives as normal as possible once they’ve adjusted to this new normal.

AQP ignores this part of PA stories as well. While the father has sacrificed himself to save his kids, the family doesn’t depart the home and instead the screen goes black after mom and daughter discover that the daughter holding her Cochlear implant held in front of radio equipment generates enough feedback to distract the monsters so mom can shoot them with a shotgun. Do they survive? We don’t know.

SIN also largely ignores this part, instead leaving us with the knowledge that the family has resumed their original trip intent and are bound for Scotland in an uncertain world. The author has left the question open for us to decide the fate of the would-be survivors.

SIM, however, demonstrates this boldly by showing a final scene where Ally narrates over a scene of her firing an arrow into a vesp with her boyfriend now with her also on the hunt. She discusses a battle of evolutions, whether the humans or the vesps would evolve to the reality of the new world first.

And, I think that’s where these three stories really differ. AQP is a story of a family’s survival and their ability to recover and carry on after the loss of a child in this harsh new world. SIN and SIM are stories about evolution and Darwinism. While SIM does get some parts of the book’s message right, it does miss in a few areas.  Of course, one of those misses could be merely there to demonstrate misunderstanding of evolution and Darwin. However, SIM redeems itself with Ally’s closing narration. SIN is a book about evolution and the dangers of mucking around with nature. But, returning to my initial goal for this post, a comparison of the three. Obviously, the novel, The Silence, came first. Beyond that, it is difficult to believe that the writers of A Quiet Place came up with their ideas completely independently with no one having read Tim Lebbon’s novel. Even with the changes made to the movie version of The Silence, there is enough of the original story and concept there to conclude that The Silence movie adapts The Silence novel and does not copy the movie A Quiet Place.

Behind the Curve

I will avoid spoilers here and request that any comments remain spoiler free as well.

After seeing several scientists I trust recommend the documentary Behind the Curve, I finally sat down to watch it. BtC is a documentary that covers the new flat earth movement and is currently showing on Netflix, Amazon Prime, and other streaming services.

BtC doesn’t just show the flat earthers and their arguments, it also offers astronauts, psychologists, physicists, and other scientists, science communicators, and science educators explaining why the flat earth theories are wrong, but also uses these experts to explain why flat earthers believe what they believe.

Additionally, BtC also shows the inner struggles and distrust that exists within the flat earth movement. In doing so, it demonstrates and highlights the internal problems within conspiracy movements. One irony within the film is when one of the flat earthers, who’s accused of being a government plant within the movement, complains that no one will believe her when she tries to offer proof that she’s telling the truth about herself.

If you really want to see idiots sciencing, Behind the Curve is a documentary for you.

I again request that any comments remain spoiler free.

The Kid Who Would Be King

I will avoid spoilers here and request that any comments remain spoiler free as well.

At some point, everyone involved in storytelling, whether as a reader or a writer, crosses paths with the legends of King Arthur. For me, personally, I think there are way too many stories that focus on the Lancelot-Guinevere affair and the fall of Camelot and not enough that focus on the beginnings and how Arthur got the job in the first place.

Two of my personal favorite movies of the Arthurian legend have always been The Sword in the Stone and Monty Python and The Holy Grail. After my wife and I watched The Kid Who Would Be King last night, I think I’ve found a third to add to that list.

The movie is very well done and is true to the King Arthur traditions. While the kid in question is not Arthur, the movie does very well in connecting this story to the Arthurian myths. Between connections with the names of kids, the appearance of Merlin living in reverse (and occasionally turning into Patrick Stewart), and both versions of Arthur’s acquisition of Excalibur getting appearances, the movie is an excellent tribute to the various versions of the Arthur origin story.

While coconut-half horse hoof clops and Merlin saying “blow me to Bermuda” are missing from this version of the tale, there are some references to Python’s take on Arthur, as well as many others.

This version was definitely shot as a kid’s movie; however, adults will have fun with this one too.

I again request that any comments remain spoiler free.

Consensus =/= Proof

In a previous post, I mentioned that on bad mental health days I take advantage of Ancient Aliens as background nose due to the lack of critical thinking skills it requires to watch. Yesterday, because of some weather that moved through the local St Louis area, I had one of those days, albeit on a smaller level.

Yesterday’s viewing of Ancient Aliens episodes provided me with a topic idea for today. Every episode begins with a tagline that says, “Millions of people around the world believe we have been visited in the past by extraterrestrial beings. What if it were true?”

The suggestion from the folks behind the show is, of course, the idea that because a lot of people believe it, it must be true. However, as anyone who paid attention in history and science knows, only a few thousand years ago people believed the Earth was the center of the solar system, believed the Earth was flat, and believed humans were incapable of achieving flight.

While, sadly, I do have to acknowledge there are those who still believe all of those things, most accept that scientific evidence has proven the Earth revolves around the Sun, the Earth is a globe, and airplanes and helicopters fly over our heads daily.

Another tagline used in every episode of Ancient Aliens features some variation of a phrase that says, “ancient astronaut theorists believe”. I’ve always considered this to be an acknowledgement that the “theorists” were selective in their acceptance and rejection of “demonstrated” evidence with how well it fits the existing “theory”. This is versus adjusting theories to reflect new evidence that may not work with existing theories, which is how actual scientists do research.

As the great American philosopher, George Carlin, stated, “never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.”

Clipart stolen from Clipartmax.


I will avoid spoilers here and request that any comments remain spoiler free as well.

Yesterday I watched the new Hulu mini-series version of Catch-22. The book, Catch-22, has always been one of my favorite examples of absurd literature. Until this past Friday, we’ve had to settle for the original 1970 film version of Catch-22 to experience it as a piece of the theater of the absurd. Well, not any more.

Unlike the previous film version at only two hours, the mini-series format gives the director, George Clooney, a full six hours to do a much better job of following book and including more of the insanity that makes Catch-22 one of the icons of the absurd.

This production is fantastic and much better than the 1970 film. Also, this verion doesn’t shy away from the satire and insanity and the goriness of war that Heller made a central theme of the book. This is, by far, the best version of this story and the best way to experience this story outside of reading the book itself.

The only major change that sticks out in this version is the ending. The ending of this version is a bit of a surprise and leaves even more questions than the 1970 movie and the the original book… which was always Heller’s intent.

If you have a Hulu account, definitely check this out. If you don’t have a Hulu account or have been contemplating creating one, this series is definitely worth it.

I again request that any comments remain spoiler free.